Reefs at Risk
Ouida Meier
Ouida.Meier at wku.edu
Thu Jul 2 19:01:33 UTC 1998
After being out of town, then reading the debate about the source
and degree of threat to reefs in Florida in one lump, I forwarded
the discussion to a student currently away at a field station and
sent the following note along with it.
Dear Paulette,
...
The neat thing about the coral-list discussion I sent you is that
the people who wrote in are some of the major players in the
region. Reading between the lines, you also begin to get an idea
of how nasty some of the interactions can be among scientists
there - people in this field, for some reason, tend to take a
position and then make it a very personal thing, maybe because
one survival strategy is to become increasingly
competitive/aggressive/defensive as "territories" become smaller.
One would think this problem is big enough to engender
cooperation instead.
You know my own take on the whole situation in Florida: most of
the rigorous studies that have taken place over reasonable time
periods have shown declines in Florida's reefs (Dustan and Halas
1987, Porter and Meier 1992). Our current large-scale monitoring
project is also showing declines; since we're still collecting
and analyzing data from that study I will mention only those
facets that have been completed and publicly released so far.
The scary thing is that the data from these 3 studies show
several different kinds of reef decline over time: percent cover
of reef-building corals is decreasing, percent cover of fire
corals (milleporids) and macroalgae is increasing, local species
diversity is declining (rare corals becoming more rare), spatial
complexity of the habitat is declining as branching corals die
out, and incidences of disease are becoming more frequent, more
widespread geographically, and more diseases are being found in
more species of coral.
While in some parts of the world declines in reefs can be clearly
attributed to one particular source of impact (e.g., severe
overfishing, or sedimentation from coastal development), this is
not the case in the Florida Keys. Instead, I would argue that
Floridian reefs should be considered severely threatened because
they are exposed to multiple environmental impacts. You know from
the pollution and toxicology work you're doing now that
synergistic effects on organisms from multiple pollutants are
frequently greater than the summed effects from each of the
individual pollutants. I think the same principal of complexity
of interaction applies to communities, ecosystems, and probably
to the global system as well.
I think the best clue we have that multiple sources of
environmental impact are at work IS the fact that we have
measured multiple kinds of reef decline, without even looking
very far beyond the coral components. People get frustrated when
they can't trace a specific, measurably changing parameter back
up its causal chain to a single measurable cause, but we're
dealing with genuine ecosystem networks of interaction here, not
threads or chains, with system properties like contribution of
indirect effects on top of that, and with multiple sources of
environmental impact on top of THAT.
This is not to say that identifying the most damaging sources of
impact is an intractable problem, but effects propagate
differently through network systems than they do along threads.
Acknowledging and dealing with complexity is really very
different from the linear ways we normally try to understand
things and solve problems in science. But at this point in time,
making progress with problems in complex systems like coral reefs
will require biting that bullet - finding ways to deal with
complexity of interaction in a rigorous fashion.
Ouida
*****************************
Dr. Ouida W. Meier
Department of Biology
Western Kentucky University
Bowling Green, KY 42101
ouida.meier at wku.edu
*****************************
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list